2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2013.6639227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of different classifiers for detecting depression from spontaneous speech

Abstract: Accurate detection of depression from spontaneous speech could lead to an objective diagnostic aid to assist clinicians to better diagnose depression. Little thought has been given so far to which classifier performs best for this task. In this study, using a 60-subject real-world clinically validated dataset, we compare three popular classifiers from the affective computing literature -Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Multilayer Perceptron neural networks (MLP) -as well as the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the GMM serves as dimensionality reduction, as well as a hybrid classification method [2]. The Hidden Markov Model Toolkit (HTK) was used to implement a HMM using one state to train the GMM models.…”
Section: Classification and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the GMM serves as dimensionality reduction, as well as a hybrid classification method [2]. The Hidden Markov Model Toolkit (HTK) was used to implement a HMM using one state to train the GMM models.…”
Section: Classification and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the hybrid classifier, we create a GMM model for each subject, then feed thse models including mean, variance and weights to the SVM classifier. The use of GMMs served as dimensionality reduction, as well as to get the same number of features to be fed to the SVM regardless of the subject's interview duration [20]. For the functional features, we use an SVM for classification.…”
Section: E Classification and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used to detect depression they found glottal features to differentiate between the 2 groups with 75% accuracy. Alghowinem et al (2013) investigated a number of feature sets for detecting depression from spontaneous speech and found loudness and intensity features to be the most discriminative.…”
Section: Speech Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%