2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43069-022-00166-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Demand Forecasting Models for a Multi-Channel Retail Company: A Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Approach

Abstract: Demand forecasting has been a major concern of operational strategy to manage the inventory and optimize the customer satisfaction level. The researchers have proposed many conventional and advanced forecasting techniques, but no one leads to complete accuracy. Forecasting is equally important in manufacturing as well as retail companies. In this study, the performances of five regression techniques of machine learning, viz. random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting, adaptive b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To forecast sales of US-based retail companies, a hybrid model of XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and Linear Regression (LR) methodologies is proposed. The RF-XGBoost-LR model, an integrated model, performed better than the RF, Artificial Neural Network, gradient boosting, Adaboost, and XGBoost models [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To forecast sales of US-based retail companies, a hybrid model of XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and Linear Regression (LR) methodologies is proposed. The RF-XGBoost-LR model, an integrated model, performed better than the RF, Artificial Neural Network, gradient boosting, Adaboost, and XGBoost models [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1) Group 1: Consisting of five documents from the energy and retail sectors whose common characteristic is the use of "bagging" methods and data derived from the calendar such as holidays, weekends, weekdays, etc. The models proposed by these documents assemble the "bagging" methods with "boosting" methods, since the former are capable of compensating for the "overfitting" problems of the latter, while the latter correct the bias errors typical of the former [12], [13]. Other novel models from this group also propose the use of a "Generative adversarial network" to create "synthetic" data [14] and "transfer learning" [15], in both cases, to overcome the limited volume of data available for training.…”
Section: F Automatic Grouping Of Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex and nonlinear data Fourteen of the 33 documents analyzed indicate that the main problem that the proposed "machine learning" models are intended to solve is the complexity and non-linearity of the patterns generated by the variables that affect the forecast. [12], [18], [20], [21], [22], [28], [23], [25], [26], [31], [43], [40], [41], [42].…”
Section: Keyword Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they demand extensive feature engineering and may suffer from over tting if not properly regularized [13,14,15].…”
Section: Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%