2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of copper thin films deposited using magnetron sputtering and supercritical fluid deposition techniques

Abstract: :A comparison of crystallinity, microstructure, surface morphology and electrical conductivity is proposed for the deposition of copper films, using supercritical fluid chemical deposition (SFCD) and RF magnetron sputtering techniques. Both preparation methods yield nanocrystalline Cu films (< 100 nm) but SFCD gives access to a higher crystallinity for the same AlN substrate temperature during the deposit. Based on the film characteristics, a comparison of the evolution of electrical properties is done for RF … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a given material composition, comparative studies on the morphological and structural characteristics of films derived from physical and (electro) chemical deposition methods are rather scarce in literature [17][18][19]. Although the pros and cons of the different deposition methods are well known by the scientific community, specific considerations may apply to the particular system under investigation, and such features cannot be straightforwardly generalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given material composition, comparative studies on the morphological and structural characteristics of films derived from physical and (electro) chemical deposition methods are rather scarce in literature [17][18][19]. Although the pros and cons of the different deposition methods are well known by the scientific community, specific considerations may apply to the particular system under investigation, and such features cannot be straightforwardly generalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The versatility of using supercritical CO2 in the development of metal nanomaterials has been shown in various forms, including (1) the synthesis and CO2-assisted synthesis of monodispersed metal NPs, in both the bottomup 51,[87][88][89]91,[98][99][100][101]107,118 and top-down 119,120 ways, (2) micelles dispersed in supercritical CO2 as 'nano-reactors' for the growth of metal NPs, [168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175][176][177][178] (3) template growth of robust metal nanostructures (nanofilms, 60,62,[179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191] nanowires, nanotubes [192][193][194][195] and porous nanostructures [196][197][198], and (4) deposition and immobilization o...…”
Section: Carbon Dioxidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22) SCFD film quality also depends on other deposition conditions such as precursor material and its amount, as well as supercritical CO 2 (scCO 2 ) and H 2 concentrations; (22,23) they are set to be constant in this paper. Comparisons between SCFD and other deposition techniques were well investigated by Teraoka et al (18) and Giroire et al, (24) which are excluded in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%