2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of continuous beams prestressed with bonded FRP and steel tendons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
8
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers found that deflection of beams prestressed with CFRP tendons was equivalent to that of reference beams prestressed by steel strands provided that the failure was controlled by the crushing of concrete in the compression zone while if the failure was governed by rupture of the CFRP bars, the deflection at failure was considerably smaller. The number of cracks in beams prestressed by CFRP was less than that of the beams with steel due to the lower flexural bond strength of the CFRP bars [9]. This behavior was also observed by Motavalli et al [10].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Some researchers found that deflection of beams prestressed with CFRP tendons was equivalent to that of reference beams prestressed by steel strands provided that the failure was controlled by the crushing of concrete in the compression zone while if the failure was governed by rupture of the CFRP bars, the deflection at failure was considerably smaller. The number of cracks in beams prestressed by CFRP was less than that of the beams with steel due to the lower flexural bond strength of the CFRP bars [9]. This behavior was also observed by Motavalli et al [10].…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Due to this weakness of FRP tendons, the concrete beams prestressed with FPR tendons exhibit catastrophic brittle failure characterized by a sudden release of elastic energy at the rupture load of the FRP tendons (Lee et al, 2015(Lee et al, , 2017. On the contrary, prestressing the ductile corrosion-resistant material can improve the ductility and durability of the prestressed concrete beam (Knight et al, 2014;Lou et al, 2015). Thus, a new prestressing concrete beam with ductile and corrosion-resistant material need be developed to solve the corrosion problem of unbonded prestressing steel system and catastrophic brittle failure of prestressing FRP system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of bond between FRP tendons and concrete on the flexural behavior of FRP prestressed concrete beams was found to be rather important [2]. Bonded FRP tendons may lead to rupture failure of the beams [3,4], while the use of unbonded tendons is an effective and economical solution to prevent FRP rupture [5]. Extensive studies have been conducted to assess the short-term behavior of concrete beams with internal [5][6][7][8] or external [9][10][11][12][13] unbonded FRP tendons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%