2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of continuous operation between a dynamic baffle crystallizer and a stirred tank crystallizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COBC. More recently, Liu et al [37] utilised in-situ Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to characterise the RTD of a dynamic baffle OBR.…”
Section: Highermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COBC. More recently, Liu et al [37] utilised in-situ Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to characterise the RTD of a dynamic baffle OBR.…”
Section: Highermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous feed transfer between vessels can be done by pressure, 34 vacuum or pump. 20 Pump transfer was deliberately avoided in this setup to minimise any effect on solids due to the mechanical force exerted by the moving parts of the pump. Pressure transfer was implemented by maintaining the CMBOC under positive pressure of 0.02 to 0.05 bar.…”
Section: Development Of Continuous Crystallisation Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feed transfer occurs from the top of each stage to the bottom of the next stage to avoid short-circuiting of the fluid between inlet and outlet. 20 There are also two ports available in the middle of each vessel to incorporate PAT probes or for sampling. Both ports are positioned in between two moving baffles.…”
Section: Development Of Continuous Crystallisation Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations