1986
DOI: 10.1021/es00143a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of combustion in kerosine heaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported comparisons of radiant and convective heaters have shown similar differences [3,5,7,9]; however, one study has reported no differences be tween heater types [2]. In the present study, the homes having multistage elements (2, 5) yielded some of the higher CO levels.…”
Section: -22supporting
confidence: 38%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reported comparisons of radiant and convective heaters have shown similar differences [3,5,7,9]; however, one study has reported no differences be tween heater types [2]. In the present study, the homes having multistage elements (2, 5) yielded some of the higher CO levels.…”
Section: -22supporting
confidence: 38%
“…There are known differences in emissions from radiant, convective and multistage (combination) heater designs [2][3][4][5][6][7], Homes in this study with multistage combustion chamber (2, 5) and radiant had the highest CO emission rates with the exception of home 2. The high value seen with this convective heater (271.6 jig/kJ) is typical of some low-efficiency radiant designs.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The major species of concern often include CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, and total hydrocarbons (THCs). A commonly used method to measure emissions of these compounds from various sources involves the collection of source samples into a container.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…q=1.2QAT [4] The infiltration loss is calculated with equation 4 (79 q = (GLF)A [5] Equation [5] was used for the cooling load due to glass. The glass load factor , GLF, includes effects of both transmission and solar radiation and is determined from ASHRAE Tables 25-3 (79) according to window orientation, type of glass, interior shading, and outdoor design temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%