2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68066-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Classification Techniques for Managing IoT Devices of Common Specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This minor drop in the accuracy may be due to the fact that NNs are more likely to overfit and can suffer from multiple local minima compared to SVMs. Overall, the true negative classification remains high in all cases and only the false positive rate shows a variation, depending on the internal way of operation of each classifier [19].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This minor drop in the accuracy may be due to the fact that NNs are more likely to overfit and can suffer from multiple local minima compared to SVMs. Overall, the true negative classification remains high in all cases and only the false positive rate shows a variation, depending on the internal way of operation of each classifier [19].…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…IoT devices: IoT devices can be any devices (e.g., sensor or actuators) [31], and their detail specification varies depending on the actual use cases. For example, devices in a "smart forest or smart agriculture" environment, which are most likely to reside in rural areas, may have lower computing, storage, and networking resources than those in the "smart factory or smart home" sector.…”
Section: Iot Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author in [17] discussed four classification algorithms that are used, such as KNN, NB, SVM, RF are applied to a data set containing the specifications of known devices for classification. They compare the classifiers using performance metrics and shows that the KNN is the best classifier.…”
Section: Iot Devices Classification Based On Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have reviewed the paper for classifying the IoT devices using various machine learning classifiers shows in Fig 3. The author uses RF [15,16,17,19,21], Bagging [15], NB [17,19], DT [21], SVM [17,21], KNN [17,21], ANN [21], CNN [21], MLP [18], LSTM [18], and LSTM-CNN [18] classifiers. Fig.…”
Section: Iot Devices Classification Based On Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%