2018
DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2018.1451214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Classical Clustering Method and Cuckoo Search Approach for Satellite Image Clustering: Application to Water Body Extraction

Abstract: Image clustering is a critical and essential component of image analysis to several fields and could be considered as an opti-mization problem. Cuckoo Search (CS) algorithm is an optimi-zation algorithm that simulates the aggressive reproduction strategy of some cuckoo species. In this paper, a combination of CS and classical algorithms (KM, FCM, and KHM) is proposed for unsupervised satellite image classification. Comparisons with classical algorithms and also with CS are performed using three cluster validit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,18,19,31,32,109] Square sum function of the error Internal Measure the quality of cluster either by compactness or homogeneity. [12,23,111] Entropy External Measure mutual information based on the probability distribution of random variables. [30,112,113] F-measure External…”
Section: Measurements Categories Usage Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,18,19,31,32,109] Square sum function of the error Internal Measure the quality of cluster either by compactness or homogeneity. [12,23,111] Entropy External Measure mutual information based on the probability distribution of random variables. [30,112,113] F-measure External…”
Section: Measurements Categories Usage Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, several evaluation criteria have been developed in the literature to measure quantitatively the quality of a clustering. In this work, we proposed the WB validity index [39,40]. In comparison to other indices [41,42], a low value of this index implies simplicity and high clustering quality.…”
Section: The Wb Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%