2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of CF4/O2/Ar and C4F8/O2/Ar plasmas for dry etching applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applicability of Maxwellian EEDFs for the description of the electron-impact kinetics for CF4-based low-pressure ( < 50 mTorr) ICPs has been confirmed by the reasonable agreement between the diagnostic results and modeling [11,12]; 2) Under the given set of process conditions, the electronegativity of CF4+C4F8+Ar plasma with more than 30% fraction of electropositive components is low enough to assume << ≈ . The reasonability of such approach for the CF4-and C4F8-based ICPs was confirmed in several works by both modeling and experiment [6,12,13];…”
Section: Experimental and Modeling Detailsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The applicability of Maxwellian EEDFs for the description of the electron-impact kinetics for CF4-based low-pressure ( < 50 mTorr) ICPs has been confirmed by the reasonable agreement between the diagnostic results and modeling [11,12]; 2) Under the given set of process conditions, the electronegativity of CF4+C4F8+Ar plasma with more than 30% fraction of electropositive components is low enough to assume << ≈ . The reasonability of such approach for the CF4-and C4F8-based ICPs was confirmed in several works by both modeling and experiment [6,12,13];…”
Section: Experimental and Modeling Detailsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Plasma diagnostics experiments were performed in a planar inductively coupled plasma (ICP) reactor described in our previous works [6,7]. The experiments were performed at a fixed total gas flow rate (q = 60 sccm), gas pressure (p = 10 mTorr), input power (W = 800 W) and bias power (Wdc = 150 W).…”
Section: Experimental and Modeling Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations