2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of cavitation models in a Venturi flow

Abstract: International audienceThis paper presents a numerical study of an aperiodic cavitation pocket developing in a Venturi flow. The mass transfer between phases is driven by a void ratio transport equation model. A new free-parameter closure relation is proposed and compared with other formulations. The re-entrant jet development, void ratio profiles and pressure fluctuations are analysed to discern results accuracy. Comparisons with available experimental data are done and good agreement is achieved

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a numerical overestimation is evident in the downstream region. This same trend in terms of fluctuations, when a Spalart-Allmaras model is used, has been observed in previous studies (see for example [36]), where the influence of several turbulence models has been assessed. This is a real issue when SA turbulence model is considered.…”
Section: Forward Propagation Of the Three Sources Of Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, a numerical overestimation is evident in the downstream region. This same trend in terms of fluctuations, when a Spalart-Allmaras model is used, has been observed in previous studies (see for example [36]), where the influence of several turbulence models has been assessed. This is a real issue when SA turbulence model is considered.…”
Section: Forward Propagation Of the Three Sources Of Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The difficulties in turbulence modeling in cavitating flows and proposed approaches have been described elsewhere in Refs. . Reboud et al made the argument that the standard k – ε model tends to produce high turbulent viscosity ( μ t ) predictions in the cavity wake, resulting in an underprediction of the re‐entrant jet, and thus resulting in a stable cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling turbulent cavitating flow is quite a challenging task because it is highly dynamic, involving strong interaction with two‐phase structures, and non‐equilibrium thermodynamic states . Based on the treatment of the two‐phase flows, numerical studies fall into two categories: the interface fitting (tracking) model and the continuum model.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%