2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.034
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average 80.2% ±28.1% of the As(III) was rejected with a maximum feed concentration of 180 g/L. Plants ranging in size from centralized treatments to smaller systems for individual households have been studied intensively [13][14][15][16]. However, specific recommendations for arsenic waste disposal are often lacking or mentioned as an area for future research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On average 80.2% ±28.1% of the As(III) was rejected with a maximum feed concentration of 180 g/L. Plants ranging in size from centralized treatments to smaller systems for individual households have been studied intensively [13][14][15][16]. However, specific recommendations for arsenic waste disposal are often lacking or mentioned as an area for future research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the As(III) removal efficiency of NF membranes is very low and cannot match the permissible limit of As at higher feed concentrations, hence pre-oxidation to As(V) is needed [12]. Recent studies showed the successful treatment of arsenic by reverse osmosis (RO) [13][14][15][16]. The arsenic removal efficiency by RO depends on its species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, more regulations on effluent water quality have resulted in that boron and arsenic are becoming of main interests since they are typically difficult to remove by RO. Despite the recent advances of membranes, boron (Br) and arsenic (As) rejection remains low in comparison to other inorganic components, such as sodium chloride (Teychene et al 2013). In addition to removal of inorganic ions, co-removal of organic matter in brackish water has been the focus of intense scientific and practical efforts.…”
Section: Co-removal Of Specific Components In Brackish Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the pH value overcomes the dissociation constant value provides remarkable tolerance against every species, including metalloids. The research examined that the rejection of As (III) was 99% in brackish water membranes and SWRO membrane at pH = 9.6 and 40 bars and pH = 7.6 and 24 bars, respectively 53 . Studies showed that the high salinity and the temperature conditions in gulf countries overcome pH adjustment.…”
Section: Ph and Boron Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%