2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of blast resistance of cylindrical sandwich panels with aluminum foam and auxetic honeycomb cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13,16,17 Intensive research was carried out by several researchers to study the mechanical behavior of cellular materials or of honeycomb sandwich panels under different loading conditions. 2,10,11,13,[18][19][20][21][22][23] The most widely studied and used core is the conventional honeycomb made by the repetition of equal hexagonal cells. 2,24 However, hexagonal honeycombs show lower in-plane strength in comparison with the out-plane behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,16,17 Intensive research was carried out by several researchers to study the mechanical behavior of cellular materials or of honeycomb sandwich panels under different loading conditions. 2,10,11,13,[18][19][20][21][22][23] The most widely studied and used core is the conventional honeycomb made by the repetition of equal hexagonal cells. 2,24 However, hexagonal honeycombs show lower in-plane strength in comparison with the out-plane behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations show that the effect of chiral unit cell amplitude on the maximum deflection and SEA is, in most analyzed cases, negligible in comparison to the one of cell length, which is more prominent. The superiority of cylindrical re-entrant honeycomb sandwich structures over aluminum foam core ones was also highlighted by Lan et al [48] using an empirical ConWep approach. All experiments and numerical simulations conducted above demonstrated clearly the flow of the material towards the blast-loaded region, thus stiffening of the auxetic structures in the blast location, which is one of the most significant advantages for auxetic structures in blast protection and impact engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…where E i was the modulus of the indenter, υ and υ i were the Poisson's ratio for the specimen and the indenter, respectively. The values E i = 1141 GPa, υ i = 0.07 [37] for the indenter, υ = 0.33 for the aluminum matrix and υ = 0.30 for the carbon fiber [38] were used in all computations. The effective elastic modulus, E r , which accounts for elastic displacements in both the specimen and the indenter, was evaluated from…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%