2018
DOI: 10.5505/aot.2018.26056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of artificial bone graft versus allograft in the reconstruction of defects after benign tumor curettage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research evaluated retrospectively 52 patients with a benign bone tumor treated by curettage associated with bone graft, in 26 patients were used beta-tricalcium phosphate and in the other 26 were used cancellous allograft. This study found that beta-tricalcium phosphate has been healed later than cancellous allografts, other variables such as age, location of the used graft show no statistically significant difference [8].…”
Section: Statement Of Equal Authors' Contributionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The research evaluated retrospectively 52 patients with a benign bone tumor treated by curettage associated with bone graft, in 26 patients were used beta-tricalcium phosphate and in the other 26 were used cancellous allograft. This study found that beta-tricalcium phosphate has been healed later than cancellous allografts, other variables such as age, location of the used graft show no statistically significant difference [8].…”
Section: Statement Of Equal Authors' Contributionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, we could not find a statistically significant difference in terms of union time. F. Celebi et al compared the effect of allograft and synthetic grafts on the duration of cyst union after curettage of benign bone tumors and achieved significantly early cyst union in the allograft group (9).…”
Section: Original Paper Původní Prácementioning
confidence: 99%