2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-017-5540-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of AlGaN and InGaN Back-Barriers in Ultrathin-Barrier AlN/GaN Heterostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4), and prevents the injection of the electrons originated from the source into the buffer layers. Thus, the breakdown voltage of hardened structure is significantly improved, while that of the conventional structure is 530 V. However, the output characteristic of the proposed hardened structure is slightly reduced due to appropriate spacing between the IL and the barrier layer [45]. A new quantum well at the Al 0.1 Ga 0.9 N/GaN interface is formed due to the energy band difference between the IL and GaN middle buffer layer [37].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysis A Basic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), and prevents the injection of the electrons originated from the source into the buffer layers. Thus, the breakdown voltage of hardened structure is significantly improved, while that of the conventional structure is 530 V. However, the output characteristic of the proposed hardened structure is slightly reduced due to appropriate spacing between the IL and the barrier layer [45]. A new quantum well at the Al 0.1 Ga 0.9 N/GaN interface is formed due to the energy band difference between the IL and GaN middle buffer layer [37].…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysis A Basic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HEMT on sapphire substrate consists of a 20-nm-thick Al 0.23 Ga 0.77 N barrier layer and GaN channel, a 25-nm-thick AlGaN back barrier layer and a 2-µm-thick unintentionally doped GaN buffer, which the background carrier concentration is 1×10 16 cm −3 . Added SiN layer on the suiface of the device, it can reduce current collapse in HEMT [9] . The gate is fixed as Schottky contact and the gate length is 2 μm, the gate-source, gate-drain distances are 3 μm and 3 μm.…”
Section: Device Structure and Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GaN channel layer and buffer layer are unintentionally doped with background carrier concentration of 1 × 10 16 cm −3 . Device surface is passivated by using Si 3 N 4 dielectric film to reduce current collapse in HEMT [11] . The gate length, gate-to-source spacing and gate-to-drain spacing of the device are 1 µm, 1 µm and 8.5 µm, respectively.…”
Section: Device Structure and Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%