2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
65
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
65
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[32][33][34][35] The SedentexCT IQ phantom Pauwels et al 36 was used in this study for objective measurement of image quality because it was specifically designed for dental CBCT and was readily available to us. However, the SedentexCT IQ phantom represents an adult head with no paediatric equivalent phantom being available at the time of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35] The SedentexCT IQ phantom Pauwels et al 36 was used in this study for objective measurement of image quality because it was specifically designed for dental CBCT and was readily available to us. However, the SedentexCT IQ phantom represents an adult head with no paediatric equivalent phantom being available at the time of the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,13 CBCT can achieve a high spatial resolution and display more characteristic radiographic findings. 14,15 It is suitable for the radiolographic diagnosis of jawbone lesions and odontogenic tumours with hard-tissue components. 2,15,16 However, few descriptions of the CBCT features of OM have been published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They differ in several technical characteristics, notably their spatial resolution, which is defined by the size of the acquisition voxel. [1][2][3][4][5] The clinical applications differ according to the size of the field of view (FOV) of the CBCT scanner. The smaller the FOV, the better the spatial resolution and the smaller the voxel size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%