2016
DOI: 10.1111/wre.12216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study between nonlinear regression and nonparametric approaches for modelling Phalaris paradoxa seedling emergence

Abstract: Summary Parametric nonlinear regression (PNR) models are used widely to fit weed seedling emergence patterns to soil microclimatic indices. However, such approximation has been questioned, mainly due to several statistical limitations. Alternatively, nonparametric approaches can be used to overcome the problems presented by PNR models. Here, we used an emergence data set of Phalaris paradoxa to compare both approaches. Mean squared error and correlation results indicated higher accuracy for the descriptive abi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of these kinds of models relies on ease of management and practicality; however, they have some statistical limitations, mainly due to a lack of flexibility in capturing complex features [19]. Censored observations are another statistical limitation, as knowing the exact seedling emergence moment between two sampling dates is impossible; thus, alternative non-parametric regressions could be more appropriate approaches to describe weed emergence [19] and have already been developed by other authors [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of these kinds of models relies on ease of management and practicality; however, they have some statistical limitations, mainly due to a lack of flexibility in capturing complex features [19]. Censored observations are another statistical limitation, as knowing the exact seedling emergence moment between two sampling dates is impossible; thus, alternative non-parametric regressions could be more appropriate approaches to describe weed emergence [19] and have already been developed by other authors [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that make fewer a priori assumptions about the shape of response might therefore be preferred (Hardegree and Winstral, 2006), as they can provide more flexibility as well as better prediction power. In this vein, some authors have recently attempted a totally non-parametric approach to seed germination modeling (Gonzalez-Andujar et al, 2016). Although flexible, the non-parametric methods resemble a black box with little biological underpinnings and are prone to overfitting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Germination percentage was calculated for a viable fraction of the total seed population. There are many models to predict weed emergence (Gonzalez‐Andujar et al ., ,b). In our experiment, functional three‐parameter logistic curves were fitted with the mean value to obtain the time needed to achieve 50% of the maximum germination of viable seeds ( T 50 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%