2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-012-9743-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study and Evaluation of Mixing-Height Estimation Based on Sodar-RASS, Ceilometer Data and Numerical Model Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies (e.g. Emeis et al, 2008;Eresmaa et al, 2006;Helmis et al, 2012) show that ceilometer data are suitable for studying the vertical characteristics of the atmosphere and for using the obtained profiles to assess the height of aerosol layers and the mixing layer height.…”
Section: Ceilometer Measurements and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies (e.g. Emeis et al, 2008;Eresmaa et al, 2006;Helmis et al, 2012) show that ceilometer data are suitable for studying the vertical characteristics of the atmosphere and for using the obtained profiles to assess the height of aerosol layers and the mixing layer height.…”
Section: Ceilometer Measurements and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of the convective boundary layer (CBL) was inferred from 10 min means of these data, in combination with semi-daily radiosonde ascends in nearby Xilinhot (World Meteorological Organization station 54102, http://weather.uwyo.edu/ upperair/sounding.html). For this purpose the maximum gradient method is used, which enables the detection of up to five lifted inversions (Emeis et al, 2008;Helmis et al, 2012;Münkel and Roininen, 2010). It is assumed that the aerosol number concentration, size distribution, shape and chemical composition (refractive index, absorption) adapt rapidly to the CBL structure.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found generally good agreement, but this agreement was subject to spatial representativeness errors, and the lidar estimate was systematically higher than the microwave temperature profiler estimate. Helmis et al (2012) compared two mesoscale models, a sodar-RASS (Radio Acoustic Sounding System), and a ceilometer. They found that reliable PBL depth estimates could be made using each approach only under certain meteorological conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%