2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative review: Medical image fusion using SWT and DWT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input image of size N × N is divided into four sub-images, each of size N/2 × N/2. Each sub-image contains information from different frequency components [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input image of size N × N is divided into four sub-images, each of size N/2 × N/2. Each sub-image contains information from different frequency components [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four methods were employed to create an epidemic alarm system, including Random Forest Regression, Decision Tree Regression, Support Vector Regression, and Multiple Linear Regression [ 38 ]. Dhaka et al [ 39 ] analyzed the differences between the stationary wavelet transform (SWT) and the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) for different applications and found SWT outperforms DWT. According to a study by Dhaundiyal [ 40 ], a novel SWT-based multimodality fusion approach was presented for medical image fusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in SWT, the signal is passed with a low pass filter and high pass filter in the same manner as DWT but there is no downsampling process applied to gain wavelet coefficients approximated and detailed coefficients. By inserting zeros at each level of the transform [18]. DWT suffers from shift variance and directional selectivity.…”
Section: Stationary Wavelet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%