2022
DOI: 10.3205/iprs000167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative profile of total protein and six angiogenically-active growth factors in three platelet products

Abstract: Objectives: Platelet-derived products have been shown as promising novel therapeutic agents for chronic wounds. However, their clinical use requires a greater degree of method standardisation, part of which involved more extensive cataloguing of their biochemical composition. This study aimed to quantify and compare total protein and 6 angiogenically-active growth factors in three distinct platelet products. Methods: Platelet Lysate (PL, n=5), Calcium-activated Platelet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bioavailability of EGF in the brain is ensured by production in glial cells and neurons and by uptake from the peripheral circulation [3], indicating that peripheral concentrations may be somewhat related to levels within the brain, but this is not described in detail yet. It may, of course, affect the interpretation of our results, especially since EGF is not specific to neural tissue and is found, for example, in the skin, salivary glands and platelets [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The bioavailability of EGF in the brain is ensured by production in glial cells and neurons and by uptake from the peripheral circulation [3], indicating that peripheral concentrations may be somewhat related to levels within the brain, but this is not described in detail yet. It may, of course, affect the interpretation of our results, especially since EGF is not specific to neural tissue and is found, for example, in the skin, salivary glands and platelets [40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%