2019
DOI: 10.3390/vetsci6030073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Oral and Subcutaneous Meloxicam Administered to Postpartum Dairy Cows

Abstract: The dairy industry needs evidence-based solutions to mitigate painful procedures and conditions in dairy cattle. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of orally versus subcutaneously administered meloxicam in early-lactation dairy cattle. The study was conducted at a commercial dairy herd in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Twelve postpartum cows were enrolled in the study, receiving either subcutaneous meloxicam (MET) at 0.5 mg/kg body weight (n = 6) or oral meloxicam (MOS) at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in T max may also be due to animal differences such as breed, species, feeding schedule or other differences in housing or management that may affect drug absorption between studies. The AUC 0-inf generally appears to be greater for cattle [14,15,[19][20][21][32][33][34][35][36] than for the sheep in our study, which suggests greater drug exposure in cattle compared to sheep in this study. Coetzee et al [15] Wani et al [37] Allen et al [14] Allen et al [14] Gorden et al [21] Gorden et al [21] Shock et al [36] Warner et al [38] Warner et al [38] Publication…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in T max may also be due to animal differences such as breed, species, feeding schedule or other differences in housing or management that may affect drug absorption between studies. The AUC 0-inf generally appears to be greater for cattle [14,15,[19][20][21][32][33][34][35][36] than for the sheep in our study, which suggests greater drug exposure in cattle compared to sheep in this study. Coetzee et al [15] Wani et al [37] Allen et al [14] Allen et al [14] Gorden et al [21] Gorden et al [21] Shock et al [36] Warner et al [38] Warner et al [38] Publication…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The AUC 0-inf generally appears to be greater for cattle [14,15,[19][20][21][32][33][34][35][36] than for the sheep in our study, which suggests greater drug exposure in cattle compared to sheep in this study. Coetzee et al [15] Wani et al [37] Allen et al [14] Allen et al [14] Gorden et al [21] Gorden et al [21] Shock et al [36] Warner et al [38] Warner et al [38] Publication…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The parity effect is thought to be due to higher blood levels in first lactation animals, as well as, differences in metabolic and endocrine profiles due to production and growth. When controlling for treatment, first lactation animals displayed a significantly larger elimination half-life, peak concentrations (C max ), and total systemic exposure (AUC 0−∞ ) when compared with second-or greater lactation cows (18). Malreddy et al (19) have evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetics and milk depletion profiles of co-administration of meloxicam and gabapentin in mid-lactation dairy cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storage temperature was monitored by a NIST-certified temperature-recording device. Plasma samples were analyzed with a validated Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent 1200 HPLC, Agilent, CA, USA) procedure that was conducted using UV detection [18]. An internal standard (piroxicam) was added to the untreated plasma sample.…”
Section: Laboratory Analysis For Meloxicam In Plasma Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%