A Comparative Performance Analyze Model and Supplier Positioning in Performance Maps for Supplier Selection and Evaluation

Bilişik, Mutlu Emir; Çağlar, Nazan; Bilişik, Özge Nalan

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1128

Cited by 15 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ha and Krishnan [8] and Aissaoui et al [9] investigated 31 main criteria which were related to supplier selection in the literature since 1966. In this study, we added some new studies and summarized them in Table 2: A: Dickson [6]; B: Wind et al [10]; C: Lehmann and haughnessy [11]; D: Perreault and Russ [12]; E: Abratt [13]; F: Billesbach et al [14]; G: Weber et al [5]; I: Min and Galle [15]; J: Stavropolous [16]; K: Pi and Low [17]; L: Pi and Low [18], M: Teeravaraprug [19]; N: Sanayei et al [20]; O: Parthiban et al [21]; P: Peng [22]; Q: Bilişik et al [23]; R: Tektas and Aytekin [24]; S: Li [25]; T: Betül et al [26]; U: Mehralian et al [27].…”

Section: Journal Of Quality and Reliability Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Quality Criteria Supporting Supplier Selection

Abdolshah

2013

Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a review of decision criteria reported in the literature for supporting the supplier selection process. The review is based on an extensive search in the academic literature. After a literature review of decision criteria, we discuss the most important criteria: quality. Then different methods and factors for assessing the quality of supplier are discussed. Results showed that all methods and factors mentioned in this paper are not appropriate tools for quality evaluation. Moreover, we propose a novel method (using loss functions) in order to assess the quality of suppliers.

show abstract

Section: Journal Of Quality and Reliability Engineeringmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Quality Criteria Supporting Supplier Selection

Abdolshah

2013

Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…UmaDevi, Elango and Rajesh (2012) state that cost, relationships, agility, on time delivery and quality have already been used for choosing good suppliers [29]. Bilisik, Caglar and Bilisik (2012) refer to continuity in critical situations, fulfilling demand, cost, quality and process capability, capability of human resources, delivery time, availability, technological development, communications and acceptable efficiency as evaluation criteria for a supplier [30]. Dobos and Vorosmarty (2014) mention two categories of criteria in this regard: Management criteria (lead time, quality and price) and environmental criteria (reusability and CO2 emission) for green supplier selection and evaluation [31]; Environmental and economic tradeoffs are commonplace in organizational decisions.…”

Section: Supplier Evaluation and Selection Criteria: An Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An important point to note is that some of the criteria and frameworks presented in the literature, for instance, Choi and Hartley (1996) [16], focus on evaluating potential (new) suppliers. Of course, among the criteria set forth in the literature, for example, Bilisik, Caglar and Bilisik (2012) [30], there are criteria which are to be used for evaluating both potential and actual suppliers. In fact, supplier qualification assessment is a dynamic process where the results of the first qualification evaluations are not necessarily considered as a base for future decision makings.…”

Section: The Proposed Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing an Integrated Framework for Supplier Evaluation based on Relevant Attributes and Performance Measures

Cheshmberah

2020

Logistics &Amp; Sustainable Transport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Supplier evaluation and selection is essential to any organization, and planning an effective and comprehensive approach to that end seems inevitable. Meanwhile, determining the requisite criteria for evaluating and selecting suppliers is probably one of the most important steps to be taken towards developing an evaluation and selection model in the organization. In this article, first a review of the literature on the criteria and the field of supplier evaluation and selection are provided. These criteria are then placed into proper categories. In order to formulate a supplier evaluation and selection framework for the manufacturing organization under study, the implemented categorization is applied where a list of fifteen attributes and performance criteria is created; where upon it is secured with the help of a designated panel (project team). These features are then screened using Lawshe’s method the “social attribute” is removed from the list of fifteen. The remaining 14 other criteria are configured within the SEAP (Suppliers Evaluation based on Attributes and Performances) framework. The framework follows the objective of continually evaluating suppliers, both potential and actual ones through incorporating their performances into their qualification ratings. Based on the proposed framework, suppliers are evaluated on the basis of two types of criteria, - feature (attribute) and performance.

show abstract

“…Supplier selection and assessment, impact the supply chain significantly and it has been viewed as a multi-attribute decision-making situation (Shrivastava and Shrivastava, 2017;Deng et al, 2014;Chen and Wu, 2013;Nunes and Bennett, 2010). Supplier assessment and supplier selection are the regular affairs of strategic sourcing function and have a significant impact on the operational and financial performance of a focal firm (Ebrahimipour et al, 2016;Bilis ik et al, 2012). Today firms are spending millions of dollars in sourcing the materials that make assessment and selection of the right supplier a strategic and critical decision for firms (Yadav and Sharma, 2016;Jain et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS – a case study of Indian cement industry

Singh

Modgil

2020

MBE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate and prioritize the key supplier selection indicators and to establish the relationship between available alternatives and selected indicators by using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS). Design/methodology/approach Authors have extracted the supplier selection criteria from literature and used a combined SWARA-WASPAS method to evaluate and rank the criteria’s. SWARA is applied for evaluating and weighting selection criteria, whereas WASPAS helped in evaluating different available alternatives based on supplier selection indicators. Findings Finding from SWARA suggests that supplier management is the high weighted criteria followed by information sharing and joint actions. WASPAS was used to evaluate the available alternatives and supplier A1 got the highest priority. Additionally, sensitivity analysis indicates the different scenarios for the best supplier selection. Practical implications Working executives can use the SWARA for assessment of weights of finalized indicators for their firm in the cement industry. Further, the calculated weights can be used for product and sum weightage through WASPAS to finalize the best supplier. Originality/value The originality of the manuscript lies in the sector and methodology. Author(s) applied the SWARA and WASPAS method for supplier selection in the Indian cement industry that will help working executives to evaluate their supply chain partners.

show abstract

A Comparative Performance Analyze Model and Supplier Positioning in Performance Maps for Supplier Selection and Evaluation

Cited by 15 publications

References 3 publications

A Review of Quality Criteria Supporting Supplier Selection

A Review of Quality Criteria Supporting Supplier Selection

Developing an Integrated Framework for Supplier Evaluation based on Relevant Attributes and Performance Measures

Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS – a case study of Indian cement industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About