2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2135-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative note on the relaxation algorithms for the linear semi-infinite feasibility problem

Abstract: The problem (LF P ) of finding a feasible solution to a given linear semi-infinite system arises in different contexts. This paper provides an empirical comparative study of relaxation algorithms for (LF P ). In this study we consider, together with the classical algorithm, implemented with different values of the fixed parameter (the step size), a new relaxation algorithm with random parameter which outperforms the classical one in most test problems whatever fixed parameter is taken. This new algorithm conve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relaxation scheme admits di¤erent implementations, e.g., if k = 1 for all k; then x k+1 is an approximate projection of x k onto H k ; and, if k = 2 for all k; then x k+1 is an approximate symmetric of x k with respect to H k : The relaxation parameter k is maintained …xed in [130] and [135] (with k = 1 for all k), as well as in [117] and [118] (with k = for all k; for some 2 (0; 2]), whereas k is taken at random in some subinterval of (0; 2] in [79], where all this variants of the relaxation algorithm are compared from the computational e¢ ciency point of view.…”
Section: -Kkt Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relaxation scheme admits di¤erent implementations, e.g., if k = 1 for all k; then x k+1 is an approximate projection of x k onto H k ; and, if k = 2 for all k; then x k+1 is an approximate symmetric of x k with respect to H k : The relaxation parameter k is maintained …xed in [130] and [135] (with k = 1 for all k), as well as in [117] and [118] (with k = for all k; for some 2 (0; 2]), whereas k is taken at random in some subinterval of (0; 2] in [79], where all this variants of the relaxation algorithm are compared from the computational e¢ ciency point of view.…”
Section: -Kkt Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relaxation scheme admits di¤erent implementations, e.g., if k = 1 for all k; then x k+1 is an approximate projection of x k onto H k ; and, if k = 2 for all k; then x k+1 is an approximate symmetric of x k with respect to H k : The relaxation parameter k is maintained …xed in [113] and [118] (with k = 1 for all k), as well as in [102] and [103] (with k = for all k; for some 2 (0; 2]), whereas k is taken at random in some subinterval of (0; 2] in [68], where all this variants of the relaxation algorithm are compared from the computational e¢ ciency point of view.…”
Section: -Kkt Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding numerical methods for LSIS, it is worth mentioning the linear semi-in…nite feasibility problem, which consists in …nding a solution of a given LSIS (see [34] and references therein). Such kind of problem arises in practice in statistics [4], when one tries to solve a given linear or quadratic semi-in…nite optimization problem by means of some feasible direction method (see, e.g., [47] and [26], respectively), in variational inequalities [33] and in image recovery problems [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%