2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Non-verbal Mouse Pointer

Abstract: Abstract.A longitudinal study of two non-speech continuous cursor control systems is presented in this paper: Whistling User Interface (U 3 I) and Vocal Joystick (VJ). This study combines the quantitative and qualitative methods to get a better understanding of novice users' experience over time. Three hypotheses were tested in this study. The quantitative data show that U 3 I performed better in error rate and in simulating a mouse click; VJ was better on other measures. The qualitative data indicate that the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would also not suffice to evaluate the system only with people who do not have a targeted disability, which happens unfortunately often in assistive technology research [2,3,5,16]. Such choices could be likened to a hypothetical scenario in which the inventor of the violin decided to test his new instrument by having people with no musical training play with it for half an hour.…”
Section: Foci Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It would also not suffice to evaluate the system only with people who do not have a targeted disability, which happens unfortunately often in assistive technology research [2,3,5,16]. Such choices could be likened to a hypothetical scenario in which the inventor of the violin decided to test his new instrument by having people with no musical training play with it for half an hour.…”
Section: Foci Of Our Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This system was evaluated in a longitudinal study by Mahmud et al [7]. A similar approach has also been used by Bilmes et al [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of NVVI is usually lower than that of traditional input methods, e.g., a mouse or a keyboard, but it is still sufficient for cases when no alternative is available. Moving the mouse using NVVI is about three times slower [7], and the NVVI-emulated keyboard can yield type rates up to about 25 characters/min [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal studies have also been carried out with users with MIs to evaluate alternative input mechanisms. Mahmud et al [24] conducted a comparative longitudinal study of two voice-based cursor control systems to get better understanding of novice users' experience over time. Ten participants were recruited for a longitudinal experiment over five consecutive days.…”
Section: A Longitudinal User Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%