2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10948-016-3943-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Investigation of Optical and Structural Properties of Cu-Doped CdO-Derived Nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peaks match the standard JCPDS data (05-0640) and confirm the structure of the pure CdO phase with a face-centered cubic crystal structure (Benhaliliba, et al 2012;Chandiramouli and Jeyaprakash 2013;Sahare, et al 2017). It can also be inferred from Figure 1 that the XRD peak intensity of the (111) plane is relatively higher than that of the other reflections, indicating that the CdO films have a preferential growth along the ( 111) direction (Dakhel 2014b;Elttayef, et al 2013;Jadhav, et al 2017;Sahare, et al 2017;Sankarasubramanian, et al 2014). Another interesting point is that Bragg's positions of the diffraction planes shift slightly due to Cu doping (Benhaliliba, et al 2012;Sahare, et al 2017).…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The peaks match the standard JCPDS data (05-0640) and confirm the structure of the pure CdO phase with a face-centered cubic crystal structure (Benhaliliba, et al 2012;Chandiramouli and Jeyaprakash 2013;Sahare, et al 2017). It can also be inferred from Figure 1 that the XRD peak intensity of the (111) plane is relatively higher than that of the other reflections, indicating that the CdO films have a preferential growth along the ( 111) direction (Dakhel 2014b;Elttayef, et al 2013;Jadhav, et al 2017;Sahare, et al 2017;Sankarasubramanian, et al 2014). Another interesting point is that Bragg's positions of the diffraction planes shift slightly due to Cu doping (Benhaliliba, et al 2012;Sahare, et al 2017).…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this figure, the diffraction patterns showed five diffraction peaks at 2θ equal: 32.72 • , 37.89 • , 55.01 • , 65.71 • , and 68.80 • , corresponding to the (111), ( 200), ( 220), (311), and (311) planes, respectively. The peaks match the standard JCPDS data (05-0640) and confirm the structure of the pure CdO phase with a face-centered cubic crystal structure (Benhaliliba, et al 2012;Chandiramouli and Jeyaprakash 2013;Sahare, et al 2017). It can also be inferred from Figure 1 that the XRD peak intensity of the (111) plane is relatively higher than that of the other reflections, indicating that the CdO films have a preferential growth along the ( 111) direction (Dakhel 2014b;Elttayef, et al 2013;Jadhav, et al 2017;Sahare, et al 2017;Sankarasubramanian, et al 2014).…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations