1980
DOI: 10.3109/03639048009068720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Evaluation of the Properties of some Tablet Disintegrants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of tablets with high concentrations of L-HPC, L-HPC swelled significantly, that is, the maximum swelling rate of L-HPC was approximately ten-fold that of microcrystalline cellulose. 18) However, the high concentration of L-HPC in tablets interferes with the rapid disintegration function (increasing disintegration time) due to the decrease in the degree of wetting (increasing wetting time). 4) We previously reported that the disintegration time of tablets prepared with PH-102 and L-HPC significantly decreased (25→5 s) with increasing tablet porosity (approximately, 25→45%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of tablets with high concentrations of L-HPC, L-HPC swelled significantly, that is, the maximum swelling rate of L-HPC was approximately ten-fold that of microcrystalline cellulose. 18) However, the high concentration of L-HPC in tablets interferes with the rapid disintegration function (increasing disintegration time) due to the decrease in the degree of wetting (increasing wetting time). 4) We previously reported that the disintegration time of tablets prepared with PH-102 and L-HPC significantly decreased (25→5 s) with increasing tablet porosity (approximately, 25→45%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of crospovidone has been claimed to be due to its high capillary activity through wicking with little swelling action (2,17,18), mainly by swelling (19), or by strain recovery or latent viscoelastic recovery (20). Sodium starch glycolate is reported to work via rapid uptake of water and swelling (16,18). Microcrystalline cellulose, commonly used as filler in tablet formulations, is not considered to be a superdisintegrant but reported to possess good wicking properties and hydrogen bonds between adjacent matchstick-like bundles that break when exposed to water (21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croscarmellose sodium is reported to aid disintegration by rapid swelling and wicking upon contact with water (2,15,16). Wicking is a "whipping" action where material-air or material-material interface is spontaneously replaced by material-water interface and thus helps in maintaining capillary flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gissinger and Stamm compared water absorption, contact angle, swelling volume, and disintegration times of a range of disintegrants (Gissinger and Stamm, 1980). They ranked the efficacy mainly according to the disintegration time and concluded that modified starch and cellulose, low-substituted hydroxypropylcellulose, polacrilin potassium, and crospovidone are superior to other disintegrants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%