A Comparative Evaluation of Simultaneous Bone Marrow Aspiration And Bone Marrow Biopsy Interpretations In Routine Hematology Practice with Special Reference to Flow Cytometry And Cytogenetic Analysis :

Hota, Raka; Bhuyan, Tapaswini; Chakrabarty, Sukumar; Mohanty, R. K.

doi:10.9790/0853-1607015360

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[15] Cases of primary myelofibrosis in present study were 2 (2.5%) in the age group of 50-60 years, this is comparable with the study by Manju et al (2013) where there was 1 case(1%) in the age group of 50 -60 years. [15] Cases diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy alone in present study were of primary and secondary myelofibrosis in CML this is comparable to the study done by Hota R et al (2017) where the finding were same. [16] In a study by Khatik D (2017), [7] there were 6 (4%) cases diagnosed as multiple myeloma.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Study of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsy in Haematological and Non-Haematological Disorders

Goyal¹,

Kundal²,

Singh³

et al. 2018

AIMDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, GMC Patiala on 100 patients over period of three years with the objective to study the comparison of the bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow trephine biopsy in haematological and non-haematological disorders in elderly age patients.(Age >50years). Methods: 100 cases with different hematological and non-hematological problems were taken up for the present study with age >50 years. Salah"s bone marrow aspiration needle and Jamshidi's bone marrow biopsy needle were used to collect the samples. For staining Leishmann's and H&E stains were used. Results: Majority of the cases were in the age of 50-60. Majority of haematological disorders comprised of anaemia (62%), leukemia(17.7%), multiple myeloma (7.5%), primary myelofibrosis(2.5%), myeloproliferative disorders(2.5%), hypocellular marrow (2.5%), increased eoisinophils and precurcors(1.2%), NHL (1.2%) lymphocytosis(1.2%) and plasmacytosis (1.2%). Both of the 2 cases of nonhaematological disorders were of metastatic carcinomatous deposists. Conclusion: The bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy were comparative in most of the haematological disorders except in primary and secondary myelofibrosis where biopsy provided clue to the diagnosis. Non-haematological disorders showed the same findings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…[15] Cases diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy alone in present study were of primary and secondary myelofibrosis in CML this is comparable to the study done by Hota R et al (2017) where the finding were same. [16] In a study by Khatik D (2017), [7] there were 6 (4%) cases diagnosed as multiple myeloma. Male to female ratio was 1:1.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Comparative Study of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsy in Haematological and Non-Haematological Disorders

Goyal¹,

Kundal²,

Singh³

et al. 2018

AIMDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Role of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Marrow Biopsy in Haematological Disorders

Das

Kerketta

Baruah³

2022

IJAR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow trephine biopsy are the two procedures done for the diagnosis of both hematological and non-hematological disorders and are complimentary to each other. To studyAim and Objective: the essential haematological evaluation of cases where bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy is indicated and to correlate the ndings of bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy in diagnosing various haematological disorders. The study wasMaterial and Methods: done on 86 patients in the age group 10-80 years. All had undergone simultaneous bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy procedures in the department of Clinical Haematology in a tertiary hospital. Standard methods were followed for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedure and for staining and evaluation of cellular aspirate. The Male to Female ratio of 1.4:1; 60% of patients belonged to 20-Observation & Results: 60years group. Bone marrow and aspiration yield high diagnostic evaluation in megaloblastic anaemia (89.47%) against aspirates (10.52%) with p value of 0.00086 while in aplastc anaemia the aspirate evaluation shows better diagnostic yield (p value of 0.285). A combinationConclusion: of bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy give a better morphology of the cells and with good picture of the architecture and pattern of distribution of the cells. There is high diagnostic yield in evaluation of anemia.

show abstract

A Comparative Evaluation of Simultaneous Bone Marrow Aspiration And Bone Marrow Biopsy Interpretations In Routine Hematology Practice with Special Reference to Flow Cytometry And Cytogenetic Analysis :

Cited by 2 publications

References 16 publications

Comparative Study of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsy in Haematological and Non-Haematological Disorders

Comparative Study of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Bone Marrow Trephine Biopsy in Haematological and Non-Haematological Disorders

Role of Bone Marrow Aspiration and Marrow Biopsy in Haematological Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About