The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0299-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative evaluation of PDQ-Evidence

Abstract: BackgroundA strategy for minimising the time and obstacles to accessing systematic reviews of health system evidence is to collect them in a freely available database and make them easy to find through a simple ‘Google-style’ search interface. PDQ-Evidence was developed in this way. The objective of this study was to compare PDQ-Evidence to six other databases, namely Cochrane Library, EVIPNet VHL, Google Scholar, Health Systems Evidence, PubMed and Trip.MethodsWe recruited healthcare policy-makers, managers a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will develop a comprehensive search strategy for peer-reviewed literature, and search the following databases from inception to the date of the search: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, PubMed and PDQ-Evidence. 21 We will use standard Cochrane methods for the screening of search outputs, selection of reviews, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality of included reviews. 22 23 For each included systematic review, we will prepare key messages, important background information, a summary of the findings of the review and structured assessments of the relevance of the review for South Africa.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will develop a comprehensive search strategy for peer-reviewed literature, and search the following databases from inception to the date of the search: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, PubMed and PDQ-Evidence. 21 We will use standard Cochrane methods for the screening of search outputs, selection of reviews, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality of included reviews. 22 23 For each included systematic review, we will prepare key messages, important background information, a summary of the findings of the review and structured assessments of the relevance of the review for South Africa.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%