2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/compsac48688.2020.00-53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Evaluation of Heart Rate Estimation Methods using Face Videos

Abstract: https://repositorio.uam.es Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the original DeepPhys model from [6] is not publicly available, instead of training a new CAN from scratch, we decided to initialize DeepFakesON-Phys with the weights from the model pre-trained for heart rate estimation presented in [18], which is also an adaptation of DeepPhys but trained using the COHFACE database [22]. This model also showed to have high accuracy in the heart rate estimation task using real face videos, so our idea is to take benefit of that acquired knowledge to better train DeepFakesON-Phys through a proper fine-tuning process.…”
Section: Deepfakeson-physmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the original DeepPhys model from [6] is not publicly available, instead of training a new CAN from scratch, we decided to initialize DeepFakesON-Phys with the weights from the model pre-trained for heart rate estimation presented in [18], which is also an adaptation of DeepPhys but trained using the COHFACE database [22]. This model also showed to have high accuracy in the heart rate estimation task using real face videos, so our idea is to take benefit of that acquired knowledge to better train DeepFakesON-Phys through a proper fine-tuning process.…”
Section: Deepfakeson-physmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observing the results, it seems clear that the fake detectors have learnt to distinguish the spatio-temporal differences between the real/fake faces of Celeb-DF v2 and DFDC Preview databases. Since all the convolutional layers of the proposed fake detector are frozen (the network was originally initialized with the weights from the model trained to predict the heart rate [18]), and we only train the last fully connected layers, we can conclude that the proposed detection approach based on physiological measurement is successful using pulse-related features for distinguishing between real and fake faces. These results prove that the current face manipulation techniques do not pay attention to the heart-rate-related physiological information of the human being when synthesizing fake videos.…”
Section: Deepfakes Detection At Frame Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have the target of distinguishing presentation attacks from genuine access attempts based on the analysis of motion. The analysis may consist in detecting any physiological sign of life, for example: pulse [42], eye-blinking [19], facial expression changes [68], or mouth movements. This objective is achieved using knowledge of the human anatomy and physiology.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important aspects is the absence of a direct contact between teachers and students. As a result, recent elearning platforms (Hernandez-Ortega et al 2020a) allow to incorporate novel technologies to estimate different factors such as the attention level (Daza et al 2020), the heart rate (Hernandez-Ortega et al 2020b), the emotional state (Shen, Wang, and Shen 2009), and the gaze and head pose (Asteriadis et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%