2012
DOI: 10.2298/csis110316068p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative evaluation of effort estimation methods in the software life cycle

Abstract: Even though there are a number of software size and effort measurement methods proposed in literature, they are not widely adopted in the practice. According to literature, only 30% of software companies use measurement, mostly as a method for additional validation. In order to determine whether the objective metric approach can give results of the same quality or better than the estimates relying on work breakdown and expert judgment, we have validated several standard functional measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, only very few studies have empirically investigated the use of approximate size measures for the managerial task to estimate the development effort of a software system. Popovic et al [45], investigated the effectiveness of several FSM to predict effort estimation on 30 software projects, including also an approximation of NESMA. However, the main aim of this paper was to show the great potential of using functional measurement for effort prediction, able to achieve an estimate accuracy close or even better than accuracies found in the practice [45].…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, only very few studies have empirically investigated the use of approximate size measures for the managerial task to estimate the development effort of a software system. Popovic et al [45], investigated the effectiveness of several FSM to predict effort estimation on 30 software projects, including also an approximation of NESMA. However, the main aim of this paper was to show the great potential of using functional measurement for effort prediction, able to achieve an estimate accuracy close or even better than accuracies found in the practice [45].…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Popović y Bojić indican que el mayor problema es la ausencia de un estándar que precisamente defina que es un caso de uso debido a que difieren de proyecto a proyecto (Popović & Bojić, 2012). Thomas y Remón indican que debido a las múltiples formas que existen para describir un caso de uso, el resultado del valor de los Puntos de Caso de Uso puede variar considerablemente aplicando contabilización por transacciones u escenarios (Thomas & Remón, 2011).…”
Section: Discusionesunclassified
“…Project efforts are in the range from 2 to 14 person-months. The data set is an extension of 27 projects used in our previous research [10], where additional information about the data set can be found.…”
Section: Data Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, a number of researchers [6][7][8][9][10][11] thoroughly evaluated how effectively UCP size can be applied for estimating project effort. Therefore, research for the past couple of years focused on improving the UCP method using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques or modifications of UCP size [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%