A Comparative Evaluation of Diffractive Trifocal and New Refractive/Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses for Refractive Lens Exchange

Özülken, Kemal; Kızıltoprak, Hasan; Yüksel, Erdem; Mumcuoğlu, Tarkan

doi:10.1080/02713683.2020.1833347

Cited by 24 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This explains the difference between monocular postoperative UNVA (0.11 ± 0.15 logMAR) and DCNVA (0.37 ± 0.36 logMAR), with values of this last visual parameter consistent with those reported for other refractive and diffractive EDOF IOLs. 8 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 16 , 20 Mean DCNVA values of 0.32 ± 0.19 and 0.39 ± 0.21 logMAR were reported by Reinhard et al 9 at 6 months after implantation of the diffractive IOLs AT LARA 829MP and Tecnis Symfony. Savini et al 20 obtained a mean DCNVA of 0.35 ± 0.14 logMAR in a group of 20 patients bilaterally implanted with the refractive EDOF IOL MiniWell.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…1,2,4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] A common finding with all types of EDOF IOLs is an effective visual restoration at intermediate vision, but the level of near vision achieved varies significantly among IOL models. 1,2,4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] A novel recent EDOF approach has been developed for presbyopia correction based on the combination of primary and secondary spherical aberrations of opposite signs with a transition zone to a peripheral monofocal area (Synthesis PLUS, Cutting Edge, Montpellier, France). The theoretical aim of this new design is to deliver continuous high-contrast vision from distance to intermediate vision, while maintaining a functional level of near vision and preserving the ocular optical quality within an acceptable range to avoid the induction of light disturbances, such as halos, glare or starbursts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Outcomes with a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens: Pilot Study

Iradier¹,

Cruz²,

Gentile³

et al. 2021

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of cataract surgery with implantation of a novel model of extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Pilot case series enrolling a total of 27 eyes of 16 patients (49 to 84 years) undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of the EDOF IOL Synthesis PLUS (Cutting Edge, Montpellier, France). Near (UNVA, uncorrected near visual acuity; DCNVA, distance-corrected near visual acuity) and distance visual acuity (uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, UDVA and CDVA), monocular defocus curve and refractive outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Results: Mean postoperative UDVA, UNVA and DCNVA were 0.11±0.17, 0.14±0.22 and 0.37 ±0.36 logMAR, respectively. A total of 84.6%, 91.7%, and 96.3% of eyes achieved postoperative UDVA, UNVA and CDVA of 0.20 logMAR or better. A total of 78.6% of eyes achieved postoperative DCNVA of 0.30 logMAR or better. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent was −0.76±0.53 D. The distance-corrected visual acuity was maintained on average over a value of 0.30 logMAR for the range of defocus levels between +1.00 and −1.50 D. Conclusion: The implantation of the Synthesis plus EDOF IOL after cataract surgery seems to provide functional levels of distance, intermediate and near visual acuity. The near visual performance with this new IOL might be significantly enhanced using a micro-monovision approach. The results of this pilot study should be confirmed in future clinical trials.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 84%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Outcomes with a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens: Pilot Study

Iradier¹,

Cruz²,

Gentile³

et al. 2021

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are several lens options for providing uncorrected distance, intermediate and near vision. These include: monovision, accommodating lenses, multifocal and trifocal lenses of various powers and types, and extended depth of focus lenses [37,38]. RLE is not a good option for pre-presbyopic patients, as they will perceive a significant loss in quality of their intermediate and near vision even with the advanced lens options described earlier.…”

Section: Refractive Lens Exchangementioning

confidence: 99%

Choosing the right surgical treatment for hyperopia

Grzeszkowiak¹,

Wierzbowska

2022

Ophthatherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several aspects make the treatment of hyperopia and selecting the treatment method challenging. This article has reviewed the main surgical options for hyperopia and factors that must be considered when choosing the right treatment. The modern refractive technology offers excellent options with the optimal choice of procedure being dependent on the level of refractive error, age of the patient and the unique anatomical factors in each case. Surgeons must perform a complete evaluation and risk-benefit assessment of the individual patient to select the best procedure.

show abstract

“…The 1-mm aspheric zone occupies the center of the IOL and is surrounded by a 6-mm refractive ring. It is available in powers from 5 to 30 D, with an intermediate addition of + 3 D [25].…”

Section: Intraocular Lensesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses in Patients Not Suitable for Multifocal Lenses

Álvarez-García

Fuente-García

Muñoz-Puyol

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the visual and patient-reported outcomes of patients undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) who were not good candidates for multifocal IOL implantation Methods Retrospective analysis of data from 30 eyes (23 patients) undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of one of two EDOF IOLs (follow-up: 37.9 ± 16.2 months), and prospective observational study including 106 eyes (78 patients) implanted with one of 6 different EDOF models (follow-up: 8.0 ± 7.7 months). Patients recruited had one of the following conditions: monofocal IOL implanted in the fellow eye, previous corneal refractive surgery, mild and non-progressive maculopathy or glaucoma, age > 75 years, amblyopia, or previous vitrectomy. Results In the retrospective phase, significant improvements were found in uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA) and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) (p ≤ 0.013), with a non-significant trend to improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA). A total of 90% of patients were completely to moderately satisfied with the outcome achieved. In the prospective phase, significant improvements were found in UDVA, CDVA, UNVA and CNVA (p ≤ 0.032), with a total of 85.5% of patients being completely to moderately satisfied (dissatisfaction 3.3%). In both phases, extreme difficulties were only reported by a limited percentage of patients for performing some near vision activities. Conclusions EDOF IOLs should be considered as a new therapeutic option in this type of patients, being a viable alternative to monofocal IOLs.

show abstract

A Comparative Evaluation of Diffractive Trifocal and New Refractive/Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses for Refractive Lens Exchange

Cited by 24 publications

References 23 publications

Clinical Outcomes with a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens: Pilot Study

Clinical Outcomes with a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens: Pilot Study

Choosing the right surgical treatment for hyperopia

Evaluation of Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses in Patients Not Suitable for Multifocal Lenses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About