1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00181-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative evaluation of aflatoxin B1 genotoxicity in fish models using the Comet assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some interindividual differences were detected, in agreement with other studies (Mitchelmore and Chipman, 1998). Our results also agreed with those of Abd-Allah et al (1999) showing that the comet assay is an effective, simple and rapid method for assessing genetic damage caused by heavy metals in fish. The few reports that have examined fish chromosomal aberrations have been limited to studying the effects of radiation on some cichlid species (Manna and Som, 1982;Som and Manna, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some interindividual differences were detected, in agreement with other studies (Mitchelmore and Chipman, 1998). Our results also agreed with those of Abd-Allah et al (1999) showing that the comet assay is an effective, simple and rapid method for assessing genetic damage caused by heavy metals in fish. The few reports that have examined fish chromosomal aberrations have been limited to studying the effects of radiation on some cichlid species (Manna and Som, 1982;Som and Manna, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) tests have been applied to various fish species (Kligerman, 1979;Vigfusson et al, 1983) and the clastogenic effects of carcinogenic-mutagenic chemicals on kidney cells of Cyprinius carpio have been described (Al-Sabti, 1986). The comet assay is useful for evaluating genetic alterations and has been used as a rapid method to monitor genotoxicity in bullheads and carp (Monteith and Vanstone, 1995) and to detect the effects of carcinogens, such as aflatoxins, in trout and channel catfish (Abd-Allah et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of DNA in the tail region (tail % DNA) was thought to be the most suitable standard for measuring DNA damage. The results demonstrated higher tail moment in aquatic insects gathered from 2 diverse polluted water streams (Nikla and Elmansoreyah) than the control and (Best and Ross, 1977) likewise got comparable results by examination of change of tail moment revealed significant differences between infected and control fish and the comparative results were gotten by Abd-Allah et al (1999) who utilized the Comet as a basic and quick technique by which DNA damage can be shown as a function of the tail moment. Furthermore, TM has the upside of considering damage communicated as a short tail with a high division of DNA or a long tail with a low division of DNA (White and Rasmussen, 1998).…”
Section: The Statistical Analysis Of Dna Damagementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Also known as a Comet assay, this is a sensitive technique used to detect DNA damage in biological systems which serves to expose alkali labile sites and strand breaks (Abd-Allah et al 1999). Staining with ethidium bromide reveals increased extension of the Table 4 Circulating total leukocyte, granulocyte and lymphocyte numbers (1 £ 10 9 l ¡1 ) in peripheral blood before (PRE), immediately following (IPE) and 3 h following (3PE) 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%