1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1997.00096.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative ecological study of Norwegian mountain plants in relation to possible future climatic change

Abstract: Mountain plants constitute an important part of the Norwegian flora. They are also believed to be the plant group in Norway most threatened by the expected climatic warming due to an enhanced greenhouse effect in the near future. In this study the distributions of 107 mountain Norwegian vascular plants were modelled in relation to present‐day climate using Gaussian logit regression. Most species are found to have a surprisingly broad amplitude to mean July and January temperatures, suggesting that a 2°C increa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results, as well as ours, do not support modeled predictions of large changes in mountaintop floras (Guisan & Theurillat, 2000;Theurillat & Guisan, 2001). On the other hand, our results are consistent with observations that most Nordic alpine plants have relatively broad temperature tolerances and thus might show little response to warming (Saetersdal & Birks, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results, as well as ours, do not support modeled predictions of large changes in mountaintop floras (Guisan & Theurillat, 2000;Theurillat & Guisan, 2001). On the other hand, our results are consistent with observations that most Nordic alpine plants have relatively broad temperature tolerances and thus might show little response to warming (Saetersdal & Birks, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…5a), suggesting that species loss was similar along the entire gradient. The most likely scenario for the loss of richness is a decline in abundance of relatively rare species (Saetersdal & Birks, 1997), resulting in their absence from the sampled vegetation. Lastly, our results confirm a trend for larger changes in relatively moderate environments and less change in harsher environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Montana species have severely limited geographic distributions and/or are regionally rare, while the Northeast species are globally widespread and sometimes abundant in the region (Bliss, 1963). Narrow geographic ranges and small population sizes are known to make species vulnerable to climatic warming (Saetersdal and Birks, 1997). Our results suggest that having a small niche or geographic range makes species more vulnerable than does having a northern distribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In general, marginal populations (on the range boundary) are more frequently exposed to stress conditions [22,23], besides they are more sensitive to habitat changes [24]. In the case of C. pulicaris and P. sylvatica, a specific water-soil environment is a vital factor determining their occurrence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%