2004
DOI: 10.1890/02-0651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Demography of Plants Based Upon Elasticities of Vital Rates

Abstract: Abstract. Elasticities of matrix elements from population projection matrices are commonly used to analyze the relative contributions of different life history transitions (birth, survival, growth) to the finite rate of increase (). Hitherto, comparative demography based on matrix models has relied upon decomposing elasticity matrices into blocks, each containing matrix elements deemed to represent recruitment, stasis, or progression to larger size classes. Elasticities across an entire matrix always sum to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

34
324
2
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
34
324
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a recent model for the impact of overhunting on an animaldispersed tree species assumed seed dispersal affected vital rates of only seeds and seedlings and concluded that local extinction of large-bodied dispersers resulted in only slight decreases in tree population growth rate [5]. Similar to that study and others that employ size-structured models for tree population dynamics [14,21], we found high sensitivity of total population density to size-dependent survival, which highlights the importance of adult survival to population dynamics. Our spatially explicit model demonstrates that these previous sensitivity analyses of size-structured populations do not contradict empirical evidence for major impacts of overhunting on tree demography over decadal timescales, including declines in animal-dispersed tree abundance [12] and rapid evolutionary changes in seed size [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, a recent model for the impact of overhunting on an animaldispersed tree species assumed seed dispersal affected vital rates of only seeds and seedlings and concluded that local extinction of large-bodied dispersers resulted in only slight decreases in tree population growth rate [5]. Similar to that study and others that employ size-structured models for tree population dynamics [14,21], we found high sensitivity of total population density to size-dependent survival, which highlights the importance of adult survival to population dynamics. Our spatially explicit model demonstrates that these previous sensitivity analyses of size-structured populations do not contradict empirical evidence for major impacts of overhunting on tree demography over decadal timescales, including declines in animal-dispersed tree abundance [12] and rapid evolutionary changes in seed size [49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The most comprehensive study to date tracked changes in a tree community as hunting increased over a 15-year period and found increased spatial aggregation and decreased sapling recruitment for animaldispersed tree species, leading to an overall decline in sapling biodiversity [12]. While these empirical studies provide convincing evidence of short-term negative impacts of overhunting on tree populations, there is a discrepancy between these empirical results and the general finding of demographic studies that in long-lived plants, population dynamics are minimally sensitive to changes in recruitment [13][14][15]. If the effects of seed disperser loss on tree vital rates are limited to early life stages, overhunting may result in only slight decreases in tree population growth rates [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main uncertainties were around survival, growth and fecundity, which tend to be negatively correlated across plant life histories (Franco and Silvertown 2004). Our alternative parameterisations were one life history with high mortality and fast growth (survival reduced by 10 % compared to baseline and growth increased by 100 %), one life history with high mortality and high fecundity (survival reduced by 10 % and fecundity increased by 150 %), and one life history with high fecundity and slow growth (increased fecundity by 150 % and decreased growth by 60 %).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the relative importance of these factors is necessary to formulate context-specific management tactics for such plants (Hobbs & Humphries 1995). Syntheses of demography have offered valuable insights into potentially general approaches to the management of weeds based on the structure of weed life history (Silvertown, Franco, Pisanty, & Mendoza 1993;Franco & Silvertown 2004;Ramula, Knight, Burns, & Buckley 2008). Increasingly, the biotic (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%