2015
DOI: 10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Data Mining Technique for David Kolb's Experiential Learning Style Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, when dynamic model is used to detect students’ learning style, a ‘cold start’ problem exists inevitably [ 14 ], because (i) there is not enough information available to build users' profile [ 15 ] and (ii) the system is unable to infer anything for the new users. To tackle this issue, [ 10 , 16 ] proposed hybrid detection method that combines the static and dynamic methods. As an example, Liyanage et al [ 10 ] used the Felder–Silverman learning style model as the basis to predict the learning style during the early stage and followed by the Bayesian network to mine the learning behaviour pattern in order to detect the learning style more accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, when dynamic model is used to detect students’ learning style, a ‘cold start’ problem exists inevitably [ 14 ], because (i) there is not enough information available to build users' profile [ 15 ] and (ii) the system is unable to infer anything for the new users. To tackle this issue, [ 10 , 16 ] proposed hybrid detection method that combines the static and dynamic methods. As an example, Liyanage et al [ 10 ] used the Felder–Silverman learning style model as the basis to predict the learning style during the early stage and followed by the Bayesian network to mine the learning behaviour pattern in order to detect the learning style more accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, Liyanage et al [ 10 ] used the Felder–Silverman learning style model as the basis to predict the learning style during the early stage and followed by the Bayesian network to mine the learning behaviour pattern in order to detect the learning style more accurately. In another approach, Petchboonmee et al [ 16 ] used J48 and naive Bayes algorithm to establish the decision tree for the learning style prediction model, which is based on the Kolb learning style model. Although hybrid detection methods have been successful, we argue that simply combining the two detection methods (static and dynamic) remains a major drawback as students are still required to fill out a lengthy questionnaire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clearly demonstrates the need for alternative methods using today's advanced technologies to overcome current drawbacks. In this respect, when the related literature is examined, it is seen that the machine learning and data mining techniques are used in determining the learning style of the person (Maaliw & Ballera, 2017;Rajper, Shaikh, Shaikh, & Ali Mallah, 2016;Petchboonmee, Phonak, & Tiantong, 2015). In addition, each of the standard methods that model learning styles divides learning styles into certain categories and places individuals in these categories according to their scores.…”
Section: Another Example Of the Learning Style Scales Is The Group-emmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdullah, Daffa, Bashmail, Alzahrani, & Sadik (2015) investigated the effect of learning styles of learners on the performance of e-learning environment and obtained the best accuracy value with NBTree algorithm in these analyzes performed using WEKA. Petchboonmee et al (2015) performed learning style classification and investigated the effectiveness of Kolb's classification of experimental learning style by using WEKA. When some general questions such as gender, educational level, and Kolb's 32-item experiential learning style classification questionnaire were used…”
Section: Determining the Learning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and VARK model other learning style models available are Dun and Dun Model, MBTI Model, David Kolb"s Learning Style model etc. [34], [36]. Most of the studies are based on Felder and Silverman Learning Style Model which identifies the preferences over 8 learning styles grouped in 4 dimensions using ILS Questionnaire.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%