A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three concrete mix designs

Abstract

Purpose The concrete industry faces challenges to create concrete mix designs that reduce negative environmental impacts but also maintain high performance. This has led to 'greener' cementitious materials being developed which can decrease the use of traditional Portland cement (PC). This study intended to carry out a 'cradle-to-gate' life cycle assessment (LCA) on concrete mix designs containing different cementitious blends. Methods The aim of this study was to obtain the overall environmental impact, with a particular focus on carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions of three concrete mix designs: CEM I (100 % PC content), CEM II/B-V (65 % PC content, 35 % Fly Ash (FA) content) and CEM III/B (30 % PC content, 70 % ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) content). Evaluations of the three concrete mixes were performed using 'SimaPro 8' LCA software. A comparative cradle-to-gate LCA of these mixes has not currently been explored and could present a new insight into improving the environmental impact of concrete with the use of secondary materials. Recommendations from this work would help the industry make key decisions about concrete mix designs.Results and discussion Results show that Mix 2 (CEM II/B-V) and Mix 3 (CEM III/B) could potentially be taken forwards to improve their environmental impacts of concrete production. With respect to optimum mix design, it is strongly recommended that GGBS is selected as the addition of choice for reducing CO 2 emissions. FA does still considerably improve sustainability when compared to PC, but this work proved that inclusion of GGBS environmentally optimises the mix design even further. Advantages of using GGBS include lower CO 2 emissions, a substantial reduction of environmental impacts and an increased scope for sustainability due to the higher PC replacement levels that are permitted for GGBS. Due to mix designs enabling a higher contribution of GGBS additions, it would also indicate an increased positive effect regarding waste scenarios. Conclusions and recommendations The main contribution of this work demonstrated that concrete can be produced without loss of performance whilst significantly reducing the negative environmental impacts incurred in its production. The results obtained from this work would help to define the available options for optimising concrete mix design. The only material variations in each mix were the different cementitious blends. So, by determining the best option, a platform to make recommendations can be established based upon cementitious materials.

Environmental Impact Analysis of Acidification and Eutrophication Due to Emissions from the Production of Concrete

“…Tait et al analyzed the overall environmental impact, with a particular focus on carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions of three concrete mix designs: CEM I (100% PC content), CEM II/B-V (65% PC content, 35% Fly Ash (FA) content) and CEM III/B (30% PC content, 70 % ground-granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) content) [7].…”

Development of a quantitative analysis system for greener and economically sustainable wind farms

“…Furthermore, LCA requires detailed and historical data to measure existing wind farms' performances which is difficult at the early design stage when there is very little concrete information and data available (Cheung et al, 2011). Nevertheless, the advantages of the LCA approach do come with uncertainty analysis and ecological footprint evaluation (Tait and Cheung, 2016).…”

Effects of environmental impact based on alternative materials and process selection in automotive component design

“…Design engineers should focus on selecting the proper material for new components in the product design and development stage, which will help decide the manufacturing process and other factors influencing the reduction of environmental impact [20,21]. By reducing the environmental impact of a component during the early stages of product development implies the product will have superior end of life impact over the environment [22] …”

“…The results indicated that a change in material has higher influenced over the manufacturing process in reducing the environmental impact. Ribeiro et al [21] compared an original multi-material car component to the current component by analysing the environmental impacts throughout their life cycles. The component is part of the automotive brake system and the current component includes a new multi-material injection moulding process and the consumption of recyclable materials.…”