The Minipig in Biomedical Research 2011
DOI: 10.1201/b11356-28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Assessment of the Pig, Mouse and Human Genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a discrepancy may be explained by the difference in DNA content [33,34]. Because the swine genome is estimated to be ~15% smaller than its human counterpart (2.7 Gigabases (Gbp) in pig vs. 3.2 Gbp in human [3538]), the smaller relative target size in minipig cells would yield a correspondingly lower level of γ-H2AX foci, other factors being equal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a discrepancy may be explained by the difference in DNA content [33,34]. Because the swine genome is estimated to be ~15% smaller than its human counterpart (2.7 Gigabases (Gbp) in pig vs. 3.2 Gbp in human [3538]), the smaller relative target size in minipig cells would yield a correspondingly lower level of γ-H2AX foci, other factors being equal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swine are an important models for human anatomy, nutrition, metabolism and immunology [1][2][3]. Their organs are anatomically and histologically similar to humans as are their sensory innervation and blood supply [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their organs are anatomically and histologically similar to humans as are their sensory innervation and blood supply [4]. Pigs are naturally susceptible to infection with organisms that are closely related or identical to those species infecting humans including helminths (Ascaris, Taenia, Trichuris, Trichinella, Shistosoma, Strongyloides), bacteria (Campylobacter, Chlamydia, Eschericia coli, Helicobacter, Neisseria, Mycoplasma, Salmonella), protozoans (Toxoplasma) and viri (Coronavirus, Hepatitis E, Influenza, Nipah, Reovirus, Rotavirus) [2,5,6]. The last 10 years has seen a boon in the development of genetically modified pig as models for human cardiovascular and lung disease, neurodegenerative and musculoskeletal disorders [7,8] and cancer [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, structural MRI, functional MRI, and positron emission tomography have all been conducted in pigs (Conrad et al, 2012b; Fang et al, 2005; Jakobsen et al, 2006). Additionally, piglets can undergo cognitive testing at a young age and show greater overlap with humans in genes involved in immunity compared to rodents (Dawson, 2011; Dilger and Johnson, 2010; Meurens et al, 2012). Thus, piglets represent a gyrencephalic species with brain growth similar to humans that can be used in highly controlled experiments to explore how infection and inflammation affects brain structure and function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%