2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
402
0
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 600 publications
(446 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
402
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecosystems with their structures, processes, and functions provide different potentials for ES. The real value of ES for the welfare of the people is defined through the use of these services, i.e., by the presence of users in the appropriate scale (Costanza 2008;Fisher et al 2009;Syrbe and Walz 2012;Bagstad et al 2013). Consequently, the determination of the spatial scales of ES is important for ES management, for compensation mechanisms, and for the integration of values into the economy.…”
Section: Problems Of Scale Of Es In Russia and Estimation Of Providedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ecosystems with their structures, processes, and functions provide different potentials for ES. The real value of ES for the welfare of the people is defined through the use of these services, i.e., by the presence of users in the appropriate scale (Costanza 2008;Fisher et al 2009;Syrbe and Walz 2012;Bagstad et al 2013). Consequently, the determination of the spatial scales of ES is important for ES management, for compensation mechanisms, and for the integration of values into the economy.…”
Section: Problems Of Scale Of Es In Russia and Estimation Of Providedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated above, the conversion of ecosystem potentials to ES occurs through the presence of consumers at the appropriate scale: global functions are always current and relevant; interregional ES are realized when the population or economy of a neighboring region (e.g., at a lower altitude) avails itself of such a service; and local ES are only used by local people (Costanza 2008;Fisher et al 2009;Syrbe and Walz 2012;Bagstad et al 2013). Figure 4 shows the great heterogeneity of natural and socio-economic conditions of the territory of Russia.…”
Section: Problems Of Scale Of Es In Russia and Estimation Of Providedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent and transparent methods are vital so that, for example, all parties in a contentious permit evaluation process receive the same results and are able to see exactly how results were generated [19]. Flexibility and adaptability allow a decision-support system to remain relevant by allowing future incorporation of new water-management assets, scenarios, and locations for ecological assessment [51]. Translation of water-management decisions into ecological predictions is critical because, as described above, flow predictions alone are insufficient to evaluate water-management impacts on aquatic biodiversity.…”
Section: Toward a Useful And Ecologically Relevant Decision-support Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods, following the principles of open and scalable data, are also recommended for the research infrastructure development of environmental applications (Hardisty et al 2013;Dick et al 2014). Bagstad et al (2013b) reviewed a variety of available tools for the quantification of ES and found that many tools are not ready to be used for widespread decision making. One of their recommendations was that the data needed for the ES models should be better organized and more easily accessible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%