The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2015
DOI: 10.22510/kjofm.2015.32.3.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis on the Performance, Style, and Performance Persistence Between the Public Equity Funds and the Fiduciary Pension Funds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for an equity-based public fund, its holding proportion cannot be lower than 60%. When it encounters systematic risks, the fund will bear the price decline caused by holding shares, while sunshine private equity funds can actively reduce or even liquidate their positions, making them more advantageous in terms of flexibility and profitability compared to public equity funds [7].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Sunshine Private Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for an equity-based public fund, its holding proportion cannot be lower than 60%. When it encounters systematic risks, the fund will bear the price decline caused by holding shares, while sunshine private equity funds can actively reduce or even liquidate their positions, making them more advantageous in terms of flexibility and profitability compared to public equity funds [7].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Sunshine Private Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%