2016
DOI: 10.14257/ijseia.2016.10.5.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis on Contingence Structured Data Methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy is 98.16 % for the WSN-DS dataset. [18] proposes the MQTT model based on the queuing theory, the accuracy of this model is 99.92 %. The MQTT model uses Machine Learning and other Deep Neural Network models.…”
Section: Type Style and Fontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy is 98.16 % for the WSN-DS dataset. [18] proposes the MQTT model based on the queuing theory, the accuracy of this model is 99.92 %. The MQTT model uses Machine Learning and other Deep Neural Network models.…”
Section: Type Style and Fontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…prediction accuracy and performance [23]. The shortcomings of this method are that it doesn't consider the impact of the data on stock prices [24] and their closing prices do not take into account psychological considerations [25][26] [48] like news and national policies and forecasting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%