UCAmI 2018 2018
DOI: 10.3390/proceedings2191245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Windowing Approaches in Dense Sensing Environments

Abstract: Windowing is an established technique employed within dense sensing environments to extract relevant features from sensor data streams. Among the established approaches of Explicit, Time-based and Sensor-Event based windowing, Dynamic windowing approaches are beginning to emerge. These dynamic approaches claim to address the inherent shortcomings of the aforementioned established approaches by determining the appropriate window length for live sensor data streams in real-time, thereby offering the potential to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three main types of windowing are mainly used in HAR: activity-defined windows, event-defined windows, and sliding windows [53].…”
Section: Window Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three main types of windowing are mainly used in HAR: activity-defined windows, event-defined windows, and sliding windows [53].…”
Section: Window Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some situations, it is not suitable to recognize activities several minutes or hours after they occur, for example, in case of emergencies, such as fall detection. Quigley et al [47] have studied and compared different windowing approaches.…”
Section: Data Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For experiments, the Sensor Event Windows (SEW) [14] was used. The SEW approach divides the data into equal sensor event intervals.…”
Section: Sliding Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the duration of the windows may vary. Authors of [14] compared different windows types and conclude that Time Windows (TW) provides the best accuracy and F-Measure score. They consider SEW as the second-best window method because SEW are able to classify more activities than TW.…”
Section: Sliding Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%