2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11182-007-0084-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of two methods of realizing elementary logic operators for a quantum computer on qutrits

Abstract: In the present work, elementary logic operators (including selective rotation, Fourier transform, controlled phase shift, and controlled NOT operators) for a quantum computer on tristable systems (qutrits) are examined. Computer modeling of realization of these operators based on a system of two nuclear spins I = 1 is carried out by the methods of nuclear magnetic resonance. Two different methods of realizing the controlled NOT operator are presented: with the help of weak pulses of radio-frequency magnetic fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of NMR, these generators can be compared with the selective ("soft") pulses affecting individual transitions in a three-level system. To implement this control method, the rf field frequency should be equal to the resonant frequency of one of the allowed transitions ( 0 rf q   ) and the pulse amplitude should meet the condition uq  [23,24,27]. Using a certain sequence of pulses applied at the different transitions, one may implement any unitary system evolution [16,17]; however, such a control is not time-optimal, since the control field is strictly limited.…”
Section: Optimal Control For Spin I=1 By Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of NMR, these generators can be compared with the selective ("soft") pulses affecting individual transitions in a three-level system. To implement this control method, the rf field frequency should be equal to the resonant frequency of one of the allowed transitions ( 0 rf q   ) and the pulse amplitude should meet the condition uq  [23,24,27]. Using a certain sequence of pulses applied at the different transitions, one may implement any unitary system evolution [16,17]; however, such a control is not time-optimal, since the control field is strictly limited.…”
Section: Optimal Control For Spin I=1 By Nmrmentioning
confidence: 99%