2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40435-019-00547-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of two algorithms for the simulation of fractional differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, to deal with the boundary and initial conditions (3,4), this was conducted through adapting the governing equations. Now, we start to demonstrate the obtained results to know the reliability, stability, convergence, and performance of DQM based on three types of kernels and block marching with Caputo sense as follows:…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, to deal with the boundary and initial conditions (3,4), this was conducted through adapting the governing equations. Now, we start to demonstrate the obtained results to know the reliability, stability, convergence, and performance of DQM based on three types of kernels and block marching with Caputo sense as follows:…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the results computed via our methods are much more accurate, stable, and efficient. The best values of parameters, which control our methods, are L = 12, R = 3 blocks, δt = 0.1, mesh size > (7 × 7), and σ = 1.45 × ∆ for problem (1) and σ = 1.3 × ∆ for problems (2)(3), and these values were achieved at L ∞ = 10 −7 and computation time = 0.036 s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where L is the window size, which limits the memory dependency to a finite window, including a fewer number of the previous iterations [3,14], resulting in another form for the GL operator (2b), which can be implemented on hardware based on the window size L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%