2018
DOI: 10.2989/10220119.2018.1516236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of the morphology and nutritive value of five South African native grass species grown under controlled conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chlorophyll meter SPAD-502Plus was used to measure chlorophyll at each growth stage. At all growth stages, each grass species was scored based on nutritive value, agronomic and morphological traits with the tallest plants composed of broad leaves, high tiller numbers and the high number of leaves being ranked high on a scale of 1-9 taken from their averages (1-unsuitable and 9-highly suitable) as outlined [12][13][14][15]. Based on the combination of nutritive value, agronomic and morphological traits, grass species were ranked according to their potential for restoring a degraded rangeland using their averages.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chlorophyll meter SPAD-502Plus was used to measure chlorophyll at each growth stage. At all growth stages, each grass species was scored based on nutritive value, agronomic and morphological traits with the tallest plants composed of broad leaves, high tiller numbers and the high number of leaves being ranked high on a scale of 1-9 taken from their averages (1-unsuitable and 9-highly suitable) as outlined [12][13][14][15]. Based on the combination of nutritive value, agronomic and morphological traits, grass species were ranked according to their potential for restoring a degraded rangeland using their averages.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjolohoun et al [47] found that the ability of all grass accessions to stand both biotic and abiotic stresses and be able to produce as much forage in less nutritive soils can be ascribed to their deep root development. Even though the morphological characteristics of the grass roots were not studied in this study, the thickness of the stem is always associated with thick roots system to function in high translocation from the roots to the whole plant through the xylem and phloem [14].…”
Section: Root and Biomass Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, taller genotypes can offer additional benefits. They can provide better shade cover, which can be advantageous in hot and arid regions by reducing evapotranspiration and minimizing water stress on the plants (Ravhuhali et al, 2018). On the other hand, genotypes with shorter plant heights may have advantages in certain situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher biomass yields displayed by E. superba can be attributed to its inherent superior morphoecological characteristics compared to E. macrostachyus and C. ciliaris. Eragrostis superba exhibits taller stems, longer tillers, large stem diameters, high broad leafy biomass and leaf-to-stem ratios (Mganga et al 2021;Ravhuhali et al 2019;Koech et al 2016). These traits enabled E. superba to maintain higher vegetative productivity.…”
Section: Aboveground Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%