Rachel Hare-Mustin (1980) concluded in her recent article that family therapy "may not be in the best interests of individual family members" (p. 935). In particular, she claims that the "required" involvement of individuals may deny them their rights, the "typical" working toward a goal of becoming the traditional ideal family may be sexist or stereotyping, and individuals may be "at risk" when individual needs conflict with the whole. This article will reply to Dr. Hare-Mustin's concerns by offering a brief review of the known empirical evidence on these issues.