2014
DOI: 10.17116/neiro20147869-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of the effectiveness and potential of endoscopic and microsurgical resection of disc herniations in the lumbosacral spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern neuroimaging methods enable determining the nature of the compression factor: ‘soft’ (herniation of the intervertebral disk) or ‘hard’ (osteophite or bone spike), which is decisive in the choice of surgical access. In the case of a ‘soft’ lateral or intraforaminal disk herniation and foraminal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis, full-endoscopic PCFD is evident, while osteophyte in this area can be more radically eliminated by a ventral approach 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modern neuroimaging methods enable determining the nature of the compression factor: ‘soft’ (herniation of the intervertebral disk) or ‘hard’ (osteophite or bone spike), which is decisive in the choice of surgical access. In the case of a ‘soft’ lateral or intraforaminal disk herniation and foraminal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis, full-endoscopic PCFD is evident, while osteophyte in this area can be more radically eliminated by a ventral approach 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a full-endoscopic method is the least invasive in spine surgery. Such operations on the lumbar spine have been proven to be safe and are performed routinely 19 . At the same time, the use of endoscopic methods in operations on the cervical spine is not so frequent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%