2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of teachers’ perceptions of emotional intelligence and performance management in the secondary schools of the TRNC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it also showed that the constructs involved changing depending on the context in which the performances are measured. For example, many studies have explored various levels of academic performance or the achievements of students (Amelang and Steinmayr, 2006; Arora et al , 2011; Austin et al , 2007; Chia, 2005; Hannah et al , 2009; MacCann et al , 2011; Por et al , 2011; Qualter et al , 2012),of teachers (Birol et al , 2009), buyers (Schumacher et al , 2009) and of employees (Behbahani, 2011; Kulkarni et al , 2009) based on their EI. But very few (Carmeli, 2003; Gardner and Stough, 2001; Jayan, 2006; Slaski and Cartwright, 2002) have examined it in the managerial context.…”
Section: Theories/models Used For Using Emotional Intelligence To Measure Individual’s Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it also showed that the constructs involved changing depending on the context in which the performances are measured. For example, many studies have explored various levels of academic performance or the achievements of students (Amelang and Steinmayr, 2006; Arora et al , 2011; Austin et al , 2007; Chia, 2005; Hannah et al , 2009; MacCann et al , 2011; Por et al , 2011; Qualter et al , 2012),of teachers (Birol et al , 2009), buyers (Schumacher et al , 2009) and of employees (Behbahani, 2011; Kulkarni et al , 2009) based on their EI. But very few (Carmeli, 2003; Gardner and Stough, 2001; Jayan, 2006; Slaski and Cartwright, 2002) have examined it in the managerial context.…”
Section: Theories/models Used For Using Emotional Intelligence To Measure Individual’s Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of prior research on the links between EI and job performance – defined as the level to which the individual helps the organization to reach its goals (Motowildo et al , 1997) – are mixed (Cote and Miners, 2006). Some studies suggest that EI and job performance are positively related (Behbahani, 2011; Birol et al ., 2009; Carmeli and Josman, 2006; Goleman, 1998), finding that EI can forecast the performance of undergraduate students in single tasks (Lam and Kirby, 2002); the classroom performance of the managers and professionals (Sue-Chan and Latham, 2004); the performance of account officers in terms of collection (Bachman et al , 2000); sales performance (Wong et al , 2004); and supervisory ratings of job performance (Law et al , 2004; Slaski and Cartwright, 2002), while another study found that the EI of teams of students could forecast the performance of those teams at project primary phases (Jordan et al , 2002). Studies have revealed that performance in the workplace is impacted by numerous variables such as motivation (Suh and Shin, 2005), satisfaction with job security (Yousef, 1998), personality (Berry et al , 2007), general intelligence (Dulewicz and Higgs, 2000) and EI (Higgs, 2004; Langhorn, 2004), but EI has been considered responsible for greater variance in performance than any other factor (Chaudhry and Usman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Mortiboys (2005) suggested emotional intelligence should be developed and employed to complement with both the theoretical content and teaching pedagogy in teacher education. Hence, emotional intelligence is seen as a great instrument which can evaluate a teacher performance, achievement and qualities (Birol et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1980s, because the power of education management was excessively concentrated in the central and local governments, England schools seriously lacked the freedom of running schools (Birol, 2009). The limited use of funds and teacher training, which made it difficult to carry out their own construction and development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited use of funds and teacher training, which made it difficult to carry out their own construction and development. After 1988, the England government took some effective measures to expand the autonomy of schools, primarily, the performance management, introducing competition mechanism and encouraging schools to join the market (Birol, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%