2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Pitch Detection Methods Under the Influence of Different Noise Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests SWIPE to be more appropriate for pitch estimation for the classification task at hand. It has been reported in [23] that the voicing decision error made by PEFAC is higher than that of SWIPE under both clean and additive white Gaussian noise conditions. Since speaking pattern is expected to carry important information for ALS/PD vs. HC classification, the erroneous voicing decisions might lead to an inferior classification performance using PEFAC than SWIPE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This suggests SWIPE to be more appropriate for pitch estimation for the classification task at hand. It has been reported in [23] that the voicing decision error made by PEFAC is higher than that of SWIPE under both clean and additive white Gaussian noise conditions. Since speaking pattern is expected to carry important information for ALS/PD vs. HC classification, the erroneous voicing decisions might lead to an inferior classification performance using PEFAC than SWIPE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The pitch extraction performance of the conventional methods (YIN [4] and BaNa [20]) and the FROOT and FROOT+ methods was investigated in noisy environments. In [29], BaNa was assessed as the best pitch extractor in noisy environments among nine methods that were compared. YIN was the second-best method in [22], where the best one was DNN-based.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los artículos seleccionados se clasifican en tres grandes grupos, de acuerdo a su aporte en la resolución de alguna de las tres preguntas de investigación. Una segunda clasificación se realiza entre los artículos para determinar cuáles son los principales métodos empleados en la detección de la frecuencia fundamental de la voz; las categorías definidas en esta clasificación se basan en la planteada en [11]. La lectura de los resúmenes de los artículos permite dilucidar en cada caso el método base para dicha detección.…”
Section: Esquema De Clasificaciónunclassified