2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716411000877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of pausing in child and adult storytelling

Abstract: The goals of the current study were (1) to assess differences in child and adult pausing, and (2) to determine whether characteristics of child and adult pausing can be explained by the same language variables. Spontaneous speech samples were obtained from ten 5-year-olds and their accompanying parent using a storytelling/retelling task. Analyses of pause frequency, duration, variation in durations, and pause location indicated that pause time decreased with retelling, but not with age group except when child … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
5
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
25
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is common in child data (Redford, 2013), pauses were frequent in our participants' productions. Altogether, 567 pauses appeared in the 568 sentences evaluated here, of which 45% preceded the verb and 55% followed the verb.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As is common in child data (Redford, 2013), pauses were frequent in our participants' productions. Altogether, 567 pauses appeared in the 568 sentences evaluated here, of which 45% preceded the verb and 55% followed the verb.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Here, children displayed a focus marking strategy not reported for adult speakers of Finnish by showing an increased frequency of pauses not only after words in (non-contrastive or contrastive) narrow focus, but also preceding them. While children generally pause more frequently than adults (e.g., Redford, 2013), the present data showed significant effects of information structure, with the use of pauses increasing specifically in the context of narrow focus. Interestingly, this finding is reminiscent of Romøren and Chen's (2015) observation that Dutch 4- to 5-year-olds showed longer pause durations before narrow focus constituents, while the same strategy was less prevalent in adult speech.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Speech materials were produced by nine children (3 F, 6 M; mean age: 5.5 years) and their mothers (mean age: 31 years) 1 ; see Redford (2012) for details. Talkers were instructed not to interrupt the person telling the story, although minor interruptions occurred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The talkers selected here were 5-year-old children and adults, due to these groups’ substantial differences in fluency and articulation (Redford, 2012; Bernthal et al, 2008). Fluency is strongly related to prosody, including duration, rate, pausing, and pitch, but is not independent of segmental pronunciation (Bloodstein, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If silence occurred adjacent to a fricative, sonorant, or vocalic segment, then the pause interval was taken to be the entire interval of silence. If a silent interval occurred with a vowel-initial stop consonant and or an unreleased final stop, then it was only delimited as a pause if (1) it was heard as a pause, and (2) the interval was longer than necessary to accommodate stop closure, which was arbitrarily but consistently defined as 150þ ms. Our procedure for identifying pauses has been used successfully in other published work (Redford, 2013) and the 150 ms interval is within the range of consonant durations (especially, stop closure þ release durations) observed in school-aged children's running speech (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Rate and Duration Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%