2019
DOI: 10.18178/ijmlc.2019.9.3.794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Nonlinear Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a new pattern is classified, it must be compared to others using a similarity measure taking into consideration the k -neighbors. The distance between the new pattern and the neighbor is used as the weight [ 47–49 ]. The most prevalent method to measure this distance is Euclidean.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a new pattern is classified, it must be compared to others using a similarity measure taking into consideration the k -neighbors. The distance between the new pattern and the neighbor is used as the weight [ 47–49 ]. The most prevalent method to measure this distance is Euclidean.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author used the K Fold validation method to predict the accuracy of each algorithm. The accuracy of MLP was found to be 96.70% which was higher than the KNN, CART and NB algorithm [89].…”
Section: Nonlinear and Ensemble Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Genetic algorithms, swarm algorithms and immune system based algorithms come under this category. These algorithms do not have the backward phase and on the contrary, weights are adjusted in every iteration depending on the fitness criterion [25].…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%