2019
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2019.2920666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of NBTI Variability and TDDS in GF HKMG Planar p-MOSFETs and RMG HKMG p-FinFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BAT can model the layout dependence (distance between STI to active) in planar, and fin dimension (length and width) dependence in FinFETs [20]- [22]. Moreover, the macroscopic BAT framework can also model the mean of measured stressrecovery kinetics from multiple small area or few fin devices [23], [24]. The various capabilities of BAT are summarized in a recent review [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BAT can model the layout dependence (distance between STI to active) in planar, and fin dimension (length and width) dependence in FinFETs [20]- [22]. Moreover, the macroscopic BAT framework can also model the mean of measured stressrecovery kinetics from multiple small area or few fin devices [23], [24]. The various capabilities of BAT are summarized in a recent review [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%